People v. Hatcher

California Court of Appeal Mar 7, 1939 No. Crim. No. 1665Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment of conviction for incest because the appellant failed to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether the judgment should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.”

THE COURT. The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Madera County of the crime of incest, a felony.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court December 30, 1938. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on March 7, 1939. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

People v. Hatcher

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief