People v. Kanadian

California Court of Appeal Jul 18, 1938 No. Crim. No. 513Published

Before: Barnard

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment because the appellant failed to file briefs, request extensions, or make an appearance.

Issues

Whether the judgment should be affirmed due to the appellant's failure to file briefs or appear.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The attorney-general moved for an affirmance of the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code and no reason appears why the same should not be granted.”

“The judgment is affirmed.”

BARNARD, P. J. The clerk’s and the reporter’s transcripts were filed in this court on June 8, 1938, and no briefs have been filed and no extensions of time granted. The cause was on the calendar on July 12, 1938, and no appearance was made on behalf of the appellant. The attorney-general moved for an affirmance of the judgment under the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code and no reason appears why the same should not be granted.

The judgment is affirmed.

Marks, J., and Haines, J., pro tern., concurred.

People v. Kanadian

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief