People v. Tux Winery Co.
Before: McComb
McCOMB, J. —Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant after the trial court granted defendant’s motion for a nonsuit in an action to collect an excise tax on distilled spirits.
The essential facts are these:
Defendant manufactures beverages containing ingredients as set forth in the following formulas:
A.
BOURBON HIGH BALL
Prune Juice........................... ^2 gallons
Water ................................ 21 gallons
Sugar ................................300 pounds
Ginger Extract......................... 50 ounces
Concentrated Angostura
Essence •............................. 3 ounces
50-50 Solution Citric Acid............ 3% gallons
Vanilla Extract ........................ 6 ounces
Caramel............................... 20 ounces
Bourbon Whiskey Flavor................ 8 gallons
Alcohol ....... 78 gallons
B.
FORMULA No. 16 OLD FASHION 30 Proof 26-% gallons of Syrup
52.40 gallons of Fruit Spirit, 187 proof 5% oz. Bourbon Whiskey Flavor 2% gallons of Pineapple Juice 5y2 gallons of Lemon Juice
[588]C.
FORMULA No. 17 HIGHBALL 30 Proof 34-% gallons of Syrup
52.40 gallons of Fruit Spirit, 187 proof 6% oz. Bourbon Whiskey Flavor
D.
FORMULA No. 18 LIME FIZZ 30 proof 34-% gallons of Syrup
52.40 gallons of Fruit Spirit, 187 proof 2y2 oz. of Juniper Oil
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)