People v. Bennett

California Court of Appeal Dec 18, 1936 No. Crim. No. 2940Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's robbery conviction due to the defendant's failure to file briefs, request extensions, or make an appearance.

Issues

Whether a criminal conviction should be affirmed when the defendant fails to file briefs or appear before the court.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Under authority of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.”

THE COURT. This is an appeal from a conviction of the crime of robbery, a felony. The clerk’s transcript was filed November 12, 1936. The reporter’s transcript was filed November 20, 1936, and the case was ordered on the calendar for December 18, 1936, and due notice given. No briefs have been filed and no requests for extension of time have been made. Defendant has made no appearance. Under authority of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

People v. Bennett

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief