People v. Upshaw

California Court of Appeal Sep 14, 1936 No. Crim. No. 1515Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for second-degree burglary because no brief was filed and no appearance was made on behalf of the appellant.

Issues

Whether the judgment should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.”

THE COURT. The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sacramento County of the crime of burglary of the second degree, a felony.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court July 9, 1936. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on September 14, 1936. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

People v. Upshaw

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief