Potter v. City of Compton
California Court of Appeal Jul 7, 1936 No. Civ. No. 10800Published
Before: Shinn
SHINN, J., pro tem. Appellants challenge the jurisdiction of the trial court to grant relief from the default of respondent, resulting from his inadvertent failure to file his memorandum of costs within the statutory time after notice of entry of judgment. Upon authority of Soda v. Marriott, 130 Cal. App. 589 [20 Pac. (2d) 758], we hold that the court had jurisdiction to make the order appealed from, and it is therefore affirmed.
Houser, P. J., and Doran, J., concurred.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)