People v. Rivett

California Court of Appeal Jun 1, 1936 No. Crim. No. 1493Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for first-degree burglary because no brief was filed and no appearance was made on behalf of the appellant.

Issues

Whether a criminal conviction should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.”

THE COURT. The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Humboldt County of the crime of burglary of the first degree, a felony.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court April 2, 1936. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument [392]on June 1, 1936. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment is affirmed.

People v. Rivett

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief