People v. Novo

California Court of Appeal Feb 3, 1936 No. Crim. No. 1484Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment and order of the Superior Court because the appellant failed to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.”

THE COURT. The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sonoma County of felonies, to wit: Assault and burglary in the second degree.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court January 3, 1936. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on February 3, 1936. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.

People v. Novo

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief