People v. Cascio

California Court of Appeal May 8, 1933 No. Crim. No. 1246Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment and order of the trial court because the appellants failed to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when appellants fail to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.”

THE COURT. The appellants were convicted in the Superior Court of San Joaquin County of a felony, to wit: Robbery of the first degree.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court December 30, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellants. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for [644]oral argument on May 8, 1933. No appearance was made for appellants at the time the ease was called for hearing.

Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.

People v. Cascio

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief