People v. Clay

California Court of Appeal May 20, 1932 No. Crim. No. 1655Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for violating the State Narcotic Act due to the appellant's failure to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provision of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and order are affirmed.”

THE COURT. The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court in the City and County of San Francisco of a felony, to wit: Violating the State Narcotic Act.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court on March 8, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on May 9, 1932. No appearance was made for' appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provision of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and order are affirmed.

People v. Clay

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief