People v. Stanley

California Court of Appeal May 2, 1932 No. Crim. No. 1206Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment and order of the Superior Court because the appellant failed to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.”

THE COURT. The appellant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sacramento County of a felony, to wit: Burglary.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court March 11, 1932. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on May 2, 1932. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.

People v. Stanley

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief