In re Harkins
California Court of Appeal Sep 19, 1931 No. Crim. No. 1644Published
THE COURT. it is the claim of the petitioner that the evidence is insufficient to support the order. The petitioner has presented no transcript of the testimony. The writ is denied under the authority of In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal. App. 368 [205 Pac. 72], and Brune v. Superior Court, 113 Cal. App. 21 [297 Pac. 566].
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)