Solomon v. Franco
California Court of Appeal Mar 19, 1931 No. Civ. No. 7502Published
THE COURT. The respondent having in open court consented to remit all the judgment above the sum of $249, and it appearing to the court that there is nothing involved in the appeal except the question of the sufficiency of the evidence, and it further appearing that the evidence is fully sufficient to support a judgment in that amount, the judgment is modified to read $249 and as so modified is affirmed, respondent to recover costs.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)