People v. Kato

California Court of Appeal Nov 3, 1930 No. Crim. No. 1127Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction and the order of the lower court due to the appellant's failure to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.”

THE COURT. The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court of Stanislaus County of a felony, to wit: Assault with a deadly weapon with intent to commit murder.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court May 27, 1930. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on November 3, 1930. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.

People v. Kato

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief