People v. Finch

California Court of Appeal Apr 7, 1930 No. Crim. No. 1117Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for first-degree robbery because no brief was filed and no appearance was made for oral argument on behalf of the appellant.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and the order are affirmed.”

THE COURT. The defendant was convicted in the Superior Court of Sacramento County of a.felony, to wit: Robbery of the first degree.

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court February 20, 1930. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the calendar for oral argument on April 7, 1930. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code, the judgment and the order are affirmed.

People v. Finch

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief