In re St. John
California Court of Appeal Sep 3, 1929 No. Crim. No. 1882Published
THE COURT. It appears that the evidence before the Superior Court, in the contempt proceeding, was sufficient to justify that court in finding that the defendant was then and there financially able to make the payments required of him by the court’s order. (In re Rasmussen, 56 Cal. App. 368 [205 Pac. 72].)
It is therefore ordered that the petitioner be and he hereby is remanded to custody.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)