In re Rheinschild

California Court of Appeal Mar 23, 1927 No. Civ. No. 5567Published

Before: Works

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court granted the petitioner's application for reinstatement to the bar, finding he demonstrated sufficient honesty, integrity, and legal knowledge since his disbarment.

Issues

Whether the petitioner has demonstrated the requisite honesty and integrity for reinstatement.
Whether the petitioner possesses the necessary mental qualifications and legal knowledge for reinstatement.

Disposition. Petition granted.

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Petitioner has produced satisfactory and convincing evidence that he has conducted himself with the highest degree of honesty and integrity”

“we are satisfied from the evidence that he has kept up a practically constant study of the law”

WORKS, P. J. Petitioner was admitted to the bar in 1909 and he was disbarred in 1919. He petitions for a reinstatement in the ranks of the profession.

Petitioner has produced satisfactory and convincing evidence that he has conducted himself with the highest degree of honesty and integrity during the nearly eight years that have elapsed since he was deprived of Ms license to practice.

Upon the score of his mental qualifications, we are satisfied from the evidence that he has kept up a practically constant study of the law since his disbarment and that he is possessed of the necessary qualifications to entitle him to a reinstatement.

[17]These conclusions bring him within the rules stated in the opinions In re Stevens, 197 Cal. 408 [241 Pac. 88], and In re Cate, 77 Cal. App. 495 [247 Pac. 231].

Petition granted.

Craig, J., and Thompson, J., concurred.

In re Rheinschild

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief