People v. Brocco

California Court of Appeal Feb 24, 1927 No. Crim. No. 950Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction and the order of the superior court because no brief was filed and no appearance was made on behalf of the appellant.

Issues

Whether the judgment and order should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief or appear for oral argument.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.”

THE COURT. The defendant was convicted in the superior court of Sonoma County of a felony, to wit, the crime of “lewd and lascivious act with and upon the body of a child under the age of fourteen years.”

The transcript on appeal was filed in this court October 18, 1926. No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant. The cause was regularly placed on the February calendar for oral argument. No appearance was made for appellant at the time the case was called for hearing. Pursuant to the provisions of section 1253 of the Penal Code the judgment and the order are affirmed.

People v. Brocco

AI Brief

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief