Wilson v. Rolph
California Court of Appeal Jul 11, 1922 No. Civ. No. 4317Published
Synopsis
PROCEEDING in Mandamus to require the levy and collection of a tax sufficient to pay a judgment against a municipality. Writ granted.
The facts are the same as those stated in the opinion in Oscar Reyman <6 Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499.
THE COURT. [1] Let a peremptory writ issue as prayed on the authority of Oscar Heyman & Brother (a Corporation) v. Edwin C. Bath et al., ante, p. 499 [208 Pac. 981].
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on September 7, 1922,
All the Justices present concurred.
Richards, J., pro tem., and Myers, J., pro tern., were acting.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)