Fugazi v. Kelly
Before: Nourse
Synopsis
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. H. M. Owens, Judge. Affirmed.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
NOURSE, J. Defendant Slye appeals from a judgment foreclosing a mortgage securing payment of a note for $25,000. The complaint asked for judgment for $25,000, with accrued interest, counsel fees, and costs. The clerk of the court after trial made an entry in his minutes reciting that judgment had been ordered in the sum of $3107.37, with counsel fees and costs. A few days thereafter findings of fact and conclusions of law were filed with a decree awarding judgment in the sum of $31,447.24, with counsel fees and costs. Appellant insists that the trial court was bound by the minute entry made by the clerk.
[1] No bill of exceptions is presented, so the appeal must be deemed to be one on the judgment-roll alone. [2] The minute entry of judgment is no part of the judgment-roll. [245](Sec. 670, Code Civ. Proc.) In examining the judgment-roll we find no error.
The appeal is without merit, as the amount noted in the entry of the clerk was manifestly a mere clerical error.
Judgment affirmed.
Langdon, P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)