In re Braynard
California Court of Appeal May 13, 1921 No. Crim. No. 562Published
Synopsis
Habeas Corpus—Perjury—Materiality op Testimony—Suppiciency op Evidence.—Writ denied upon the authority of In re Braynard, etc., ante, p. 631.
THE COURT. It is conceded that the same question is involved in this application as that in In re Braynard, ante, p. 631, [199 Pac. 576], this day decided. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the prayer of the petition herein is denied and the writ discharged.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)