Rose v. Conlin
California Court of Appeal Apr 13, 1921 No. Civ. No. 3559Published
Synopsis
Mortgage — Foreclosure — Deficiency.—Judgment affirmed upon the authority of Hose et al. v. Conlin, ante, p. 225, [198 Pac. 653],
THE COURT. Upon the authority of Rose v. Conlin (No. 3760), ante, p. 225, [198 Pac. 653], this day decided by this court, the order is affirmed.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 9, 1921.
All the Justices concurred.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)