Stuart v. Coffrin
California Court of Appeal Dec 23, 1920 No. Civ. No. 3643Published
Synopsis
Place of Trial — Motion for Change — Bias of Judge — Time for Filing Counter-affidavits.—Order affirmed on authority of Stuart v. Everly, ante, p. 551, [195 Pac. 701].
THE COURT. It is stipulated by the parties to this appeal that the facts are identical with those of the case entitled “Z. B. Stuart v. Rose Everly,” ante, p. 551, [195 Pac. 701], and in which the order appealed from was affirmed. For the reasons given at length in that opinion the same result must follow in this case.
The order is affirmed.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)