Western Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission

California Court of Appeal Jul 10, 1920 No. Civ. No. 3378Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court denied the petition for review because the findings of the Industrial Accident Commission were sufficiently supported by the evidence and the petitioner failed to file a reply.

Issues

Whether the findings of the Industrial Accident Commission were supported by the evidence.

Disposition. Petition denied.

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“the findings of which petitioner complains are sufficiently supported by the evidence.”

Synopsis

APPLICATION for a Writ of Certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Accident Commission. Writ denied.

The facts are stated in the opinion of .the court.

THE COURT. — [1] The Industrial Accident Commission has served and filed an answer from which it appears that the findings of which petitioner complains are sufficiently supported by the evidence. Petitioner has neglected to file a reply to the answer, though the privilege of such a reply is accorded him by the rules promulgated by the'supreme court (subd. 4, Rule XXVI, 183 Pac. viii).

Petition denied.

More from California Court of Appeal

People v. Hill (1998)
In Re Autumn H. (1994)
Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
In Re Casey D. (1999)
Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
People v. Rivera (2015)
People v. Barnett (1998)
People v. Serrano (2012)
Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)

Related research