People v. Mosley (1920) · DecisionDepot

People v. Mosley

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

California Court of Appeal Jul 1, 1920 No. Crim. No. 505Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction for grand larceny after finding sufficient evidence of guilt and determining that the defendant received a fair trial without prejudicial error.

Issues

Whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction for grand larceny.
Whether the defendant received a fair and impartial trial free from prejudicial error.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“we have, however, examined the record and find abundant evidence of the guilt of defendant and are satisfied that no prejudicial error was committed and that defendant had a fair and impartial trial.”

“The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.”

Synopsis

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County. J. A. Plummer, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

THE COURT. Defendant was convicted in the superior court of the county of San Joaquin of the crime of grand [400]larceny in having stolen two head of cattle, the property oi one Chris Wencelburger. [1]- No appearance has been made for appellant in this court and our attention has not. been called to any reason why the judgment should he reversed. We have, however, examined the record and find abundant evidence of the guilt of defendant and are satisfied that no prejudicial error was committed and that defendant had a fair and impartial trial.

The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.

People v. Mosley

AI Brief

Synopsis

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief