Engelken v. Justice Court
Synopsis
APPLICATION for a Writ of Supersedeas to restrain a justice court from hearing a motion to dismiss an appeal. Granted.
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
THE COURT. [1] ~Uhis is an application for a writ of siopersedeas to restrain the respondent from proceeding further with a motion (dated February 5, 1920) to dismiss an appeal which has been taken to this court. Said motion [513]made in the trial court was based upon the ground that the undertaking which was filed by appellant was not properly filed.
[2] It is not necessary at this time to pass upon the question of the propriety of the filing of the undertaking. But as a motion to dismiss an appeal can be made in this court only, and such motion must he denied if a proper undertaking, approved by a justice of this court, is filed, it is ordered:
That a writ of supersedeas issue, commanding the respondent to proceed no further with the hearing or determination of said • motion, and, to avoid question as to the sufficiency of the undertaking, it is ordered that the same may be presented to a justice of this court for approval.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)