People v. Frazier (1919) · DecisionDepot

People v. Frazier

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

California Court of Appeal Oct 24, 1919 No. Crim. No. 481Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the defendant's conviction and sentence after finding sufficient evidence in the record to support the verdict and determining that no prejudicial error occurred.

Issues

Whether the evidence is sufficient to support the verdict.
Whether there is any prejudicial error in the record.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“we have discovered no prejudicial error, and we know of no reason why we should disturb the conclusion reached in the trial court.”

Synopsis

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County. J. 0. Moncur, Judge. Affirmed.

The facts are stated in People v. Peeh, ante, p. 638.

THE COURT. This is a companion case to People v. Peck, ante, p. 638, [185 Pac. 881]. [1] On a separate trial this defendant was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate period. The appeal is from said judgment. No argument, either oral or written, has been submitted in this court in behalf of appellant. His counsel appeared at the time set for the hearing, but declined to make any argument. We have, nevertheless, examined the record and have found abundant evidence to support the verdict. It may be stated further that we have discovered no prejudicial error, and we know of no reason why we should disturb the conclusion reached in the trial court.

The judgment is affirmed.

People v. Frazier

AI Brief

Synopsis

More from California Court of Appeal

Related research

AI Brief