Thannhauser & Co. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal Oct 22, 1917 No. Civ. No. 2289Published
Synopsis
Costs — Undertaking in Action Against Nonresident — Power of Court to Extend Time.—Writ of prohibition dismissed upon authority of Bertg v. Superior Court of City and County of San Francisco, ante, p. 83.
THE COURT. It is conceded that the same question is involved in this application as in Hertz v. Superior Court, No. 2283, ante, p. 83, decided by this court on October 22, 1917, wherein a writ of mandate was denied. Upon the authority of that case the writ in the present case is dismissed.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)