Superior California Fruit Land Co. v. May
Before: Plummer
Synopsis
Quieting Title — Specific Performance.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of Superior California Fruit Land Company v. Grossman, ante, p. 357.
PLUMMER, J., pro tem. This action, No. 1578, is a companion cause of action to No. 1577, Superior California Fruit Land Company v. Grossman, ante, p. 357, this day decided, [805]and for the reasons therein given the judgment in this action is hereby affirmed.
Chipman, P. J., and Burnett, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on February 12, 1917.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)