Bakersfield & Kern Electric Railway Co. v. Hay
California Court of Appeal Dec 31, 1915 No. Civ. No. 1933Published
Synopsis
Referendum Petition—Election—City of Bakersfield.—Writ of mandate denied on the authority of Bakersfield # Kern Electric By. Go. v. Kay, ante, p. 289.
THE COURT. In response to an alternative writ issued herein, the respondents have filed a general demurrer. The facts are the same and the questions presented for decision are the same as in Bakersfield tfe Kern Electric Ry. Co. v. Hay (Civil No. 1934), ante, p. 289 [155 Pac. 132], petition for writ of prohibition, in which decision has been filed this day. For the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the demurrer is sustained and the application for peremptory writ of mandate herein is denied.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)