Aizenberg v. Anderson
Synopsis
Appeal—Findings—Conflicting Evidence.—The findings of the trial court will not be disturbed on appeal where there is a conflict in the evidence upon which they are based.
THE COURT. The only point presented upon this appeal is as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings and judgment of the court. Upon a careful examination of the record we find that there is a substantial conflict in the evidence in respect to those findings of which the appellants complain ; and that this being so, the findings and judgment of the trial court will not be disturbed upon appeal.
The judgment and order are affirmed.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)