Stockett v. Henry
Synopsis
New Trial—Notice of Intention—Correction of—Discretion.—It is held in this case that the trial court did not atrase its discretion in refusing to permit a correction of the notice of intention to move for a new trial.
THE COURT. This is an appeal from an order of the trial court refusing to permit the appellants to correct their notice of intention to move for a new trial.
We are satisfied from an examination of the record that the discretion with which said court was invested in the matter of permitting a correction of the notice of intention to move for a new trial in the respect sought by said motion, was not abused in refusing to permit such correction, and its action taken therein will not therefore be disturbed upon appeal.
Order affirmed.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)