People v. Mandal
California Court of Appeal Oct 27, 1914 No. Crim. No. 264Published
Before: Burnett
Synopsis
Criminal Law—Pimping—Lack op Error.—On this appeal it is held-that the defendant was properly charged with the offense of “pimping,” and that the evidence was sufficient, and that no prejudicial error was committed.
BURNETT, J. On this appeal we have not been favored with any argument, oral or written. Nevertheless, we have examined the record and we find that defendant was properly charged with the offense designated in the statute as “pimping,” that sufficient evidence of his guilt was received and that no prejudicial error was committed during the trial. The judgment and order are therefore affirmed.
Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)