Charles R. Parkinson Co. v. Figel
California Court of Appeal Jun 4, 1914 No. Civ. No. 1215Published
Before: Chipman
Synopsis
JTKAUDULENT ASSIGNMENT—INSUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE TO ESTABLISH. Judgment affirmed on authority of Parkinson Brothers Company v. Figel, ante, p. 701.
CHIPMAN, P. J. By stipulation, this case was to be heard and decided on the same transcript as in the case of Parkinson Bros. Co., against the same parties, No. 1214, this day decided, ante, p. 701 [142 Pac. 135], Upon the authority of the judgment in that case, the judgment in this case is affirmed.
Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)