In re Potter
California Court of Appeal Jul 19, 1912 No. Crim. No. 250Published
Synopsis
Habeas Corpus—Failure of Justices of Appellate Court to Agree— Remand of Petitioner.—Upon the hearing of an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the appellate court, where the justices of such court are unable to agree upon a decision of the questions involved in the proceeding, the petitioner must be remanded to the custody of the proper officer.
THE COURT. The justices of this court being unable to agree upon a decision of the questions involved in this proceeding, it follows that the petitioner must be remanded to the custody of the chief of police of Los Angeles city, and it is so ordered.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)