Kearney v. Pierson
California Court of Appeal Mar 15, 1912 No. Civ. No. 1017Published
Before: Hall
Synopsis
Order Denting Motion to Vacate Default Judgment—Discretion not Abused—False Statement of Clients—Insufficient Defense—Conflicting Evidence.—Judgment affirmed on the authority of Kearney v. Palmer, ante, p. 517.
HALL, J. This case is in all respects similar to the case of Hattie M. Kearney v. John Palmer et al., ante, p. 517, [123 Pac. 611], save that the action is one in ejectment and not [522]to quiet title, and for the same reasons the judgment is affirmed.
Lennon, P. J., and Kerrigan, J., concurred.
A petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on May 15, 1912.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)