Pacific Union Club v. Palatine Insurance
California Court of Appeal Jan 26, 1910 No. Civ. No. 667Published
Before: Chipman
Synopsis
Fire Insurance—Exception in Policy—Loss by Earthquake—Rule of Damages—Untenable Defense—Breaking of Water-mains. Seld, that the judgment in this ease must be affirmed on the authority of case No. 666, supra.
CHIPMAN, P. J. Appellant states in its opening brief that the facts in this case are identical with those in Pacific Union Club v. Commercial Union Assurance Company, ante, p. 503, [107 Pac. 728], this day decided.
Upon the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.
Burnett, J., and Hart, J., concurred.
More from California Court of Appeal
- People v. Hill (1998)
- In Re Autumn H. (1994)
- Nwosu v. Uba (2004)
- In Re Casey D. (1999)
- Santisas v. Goodin (1998)
- Cahill v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (2011)
- People v. Rivera (2015)
- People v. Barnett (1998)
- People v. Serrano (2012)
- Benach v. County of Los Angeles (2007)