County of Tuolumne v. Oakdale Irrigation District

California Supreme Court Aug 30, 1948 No. Sac. No. 5916Published

Before: Carter

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court denied the petition for a peremptory writ of mandate, holding that the case is controlled by the decision in County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation District.

Issues

Whether the petition for a peremptory writ of mandate should be granted.

Disposition. Denied and discharged.

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“This case involves the same questions presented in County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation District, ante, p. 467 [196 P.2d 920], and is controlled thereby.”

“Therefore the petition for a peremptory writ of mandate is denied, and the alternative writ is discharged.”

CARTER, J. This case involves the same questions presented in County of Mariposa v. Merced Irrigation District, ante, p. 467 [196 P.2d 920], and is controlled thereby. Therefore the petition for a peremptory writ of mandate is denied, and the alternative writ is discharged.

Gibson, C. J., Shenk, J., Edmonds, J., Traynor, J., Schauer, J., and Spence, J., concurred.

Petitioner’s application for a rehearing was denied September 27,1948.

County of Tuolumne v. Oakdale Irrigation District

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief