People v. Fugita

California Supreme Court May 18, 1948 No. S. F. No. 17589Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court reversed the judgment declaring an escheat of real property held by aliens ineligible for citizenship, based on the parties' stipulation that the Supreme Court's decision in Oyama v. State of California was controlling.

Issues

Whether the judgment declaring an escheat of real property held by aliens ineligible for citizenship should be reversed in light of Oyama v. State of California.

Disposition. reversed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“the parties hereto, conceding that the Oyama decision is controlling of the issues presented here, have filed a stipulation for reversal of the judgment.”

“Judgment is therefore reversed”

THE COURT. This action was brought to declare an escheat of real property held by aliens ineligible for American citizenship. Subsequent to the noticing of the appeal, the Supreme Court of the United States decided the case of Oyama v. State of California, 332 U.S. 633 [68 S.Ct. 269, 92 L.Ed.-], and the parties hereto, conceding that the Oyama decision is controlling of the issues presented here, have filed a stipulation for reversal of the judgment.

Judgment is therefore reversed, each side to bear its own costs on appeal, and remittitur to issue forthwith.

People v. Fugita

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief