Feinstein v. State Bar

California Supreme Court Dec 29, 1938 No. L. A. No. 16813Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court dismissed the petition for review because the petitioner had already been disbarred in a separate proceeding, rendering the current matter moot.

Issues

Whether the petition for review of State Bar proceedings should be dismissed as moot following the petitioner's disbarment in a separate case.

Disposition. Dismissed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“by reason of such order of disbarment, the above-entitled proceeding has become moot, it is hereby ordered that the same be and it is dismissed.”

THE COURT. Whereas this proceeding was instituted by the filing of a petition to review the proceedings and recommendation of The State Bar, record of which was filed herein April 21, 1938, under Bar Mise. 1541, and since the filing of said petition and the order granting a review, the petitioner has been ordered disbarred by order of this court dated November 9, 1938, under Bar Mise. No. 1527, and by reason of such order of disbarment, the above-entitled proceeding has become moot, it is hereby ordered that the same be and it is dismissed.

Feinstein v. State Bar

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief