Hutt v. Corser

California Supreme Court Mar 31, 1933 No. L. A. No. 13098Published

Before: Preston

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment for the plaintiff because the defendant's appeal failed to present a question of law and the evidence supported the trial court's findings.

Issues

Whether the defendant's brief presented a valid question of law for appellate review.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case”

“The judgment is affirmed.”

PRESTON, J. Action to quiet title. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. His brief presents no question of law but is at most an attempt to recite the evidence in the case, which on its face discloses not only conflicting evidence but a preponderance thereof in favor of respondent’s. claims.

The motion to dismiss the appeal heretofore made herein, and submitted, is denied. The judgment is affirmed.

Curtis, J., Langdon, J., Shenk, J., Seawell, J., Thompson, J., and Waste, C. J., concurred.

Hutt v. Corser

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief