City of Pasadena v. Estrin

California Supreme Court Apr 1, 1931 No. L. A. No. 9719Published

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court modified and affirmed the judgment based on the authority of a companion case decided the same day.

Issues

Whether the judgment in favor of the plaintiff should be modified in accordance with the companion case.

Disposition. Modified and affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“On the authority of that case the judgment is modified as ordered in that case and as so modified the judgment is affirmed.”

THE COURT. This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment in its favor, which appeal was considered and decided in the determination of the defendants’ appeal in a companion case of the same title (City of Pasadena v. Estrin et al. (L. A. No. 9507), ante, p. 231 [298 Pac. 14]), this day decided. On the authority of that case the judgment is modified as ordered in that case and as so modified the judgment is affirmed.

City of Pasadena v. Estrin

AI Brief

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief