People v. Williams

California Supreme Court Mar 24, 1916 No. Crim. No. 1975Published

Before: Melvin

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment and the order denying the defendant's motion for a new trial based on the authority of People v. Jordan.

Issues

Whether the judgment should be affirmed based on the authority of People v. Jordan.
Whether the order denying the motion for a new trial should be affirmed based on the authority of People v. Jordan.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“upon the authority of that case the judgment and order are affirmed.”

Synopsis

'Medical Practice Act.—Judgment and order affirmed on the authority of People v. Jordan, ante, p. 391.

MELVIN, J. The questions involved in the appeals herein from the judgment and from the order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial are the same as those which arose in the [817]appeals in People v. Jordan, Crim. 1973 (opinion filed March 24,1916), ante, p. 391, and upon the authority of that case the judgment and order are affirmed..

Henshaw, J., Sloss, J., Shaw, J., Lawlor, J., and Angellotti, C. J., concurred.

More from California Supreme Court

People v. Wende (1979)
People v. Watson (1956)
People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
People v. Kelly (2006)
Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
People v. Lewis (2021)
In Re Estrada (1965)
Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
People v. Marsden (1970)

Related research