Fresno Canal & Irrigation Co. v. William Ede Co.
California Supreme Court Dec 3, 1907 No. S. F. No. 4376Published
Synopsis
CONTRACT TO SUPPLY AND PAY FOB WATER—REFORMATION.—Fresno Canal and Irrigation Company v. Bart, ante, p. 450, followed and approved.
THE COURT. This action is in all respects like the action of Fresno Canal and Irrigation Company, plaintiff and respondent, v. Marcus Hart et al., defendants and appellants, No. 4372, ante, p. 450, [92 Pac. 1010], this day decided. The defendant was the successor in interest to certain lands originally owned by Hart and affected by the water contracts in suit. • The cause has been submitted to follow the determination in the Hart case, and for the reasons there given the judgment and order are reversed and the cause remanded.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)