Hanson v. Voll

California Supreme Court Jul 2, 1889 No. No. 11,951Published

Before: Belcher

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment because the appellant failed to file a brief within the allotted time.

Issues

Whether a judgment should be affirmed when the appellant fails to file a brief within the required time.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“In such case the rule is well settled that judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record.”

Synopsis

Appeal—Failure to File Briefs.—When a case is submitted, without oral arguments, on briefs to be filed, and none are filed, the judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record.

BELCHER, C. C. This case was submitted, without oral argument, on briefs to be filed. The time allowed for filing briefs has elapsed, and none have been filed. In such case the rule is well settled that judgment will be affirmed without looking into the record. We therefore advise that the judgment here appealed from be affirmed.

We concur: Hayne, C.; Foote, C.

PER CURIAM. For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed.

More from California Supreme Court

People v. Wende (1979)
People v. Watson (1956)
People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
People v. Kelly (2006)
Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
People v. Lewis (2021)
In Re Estrada (1965)
Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
People v. Marsden (1970)

Related research