Straus v. Williamson
California Supreme Court Jun 1, 1888 No. No. 12,483Published
Synopsis
Appeal—Conflicting Evidence.—In an Action to Amend a Mortgage on the ground of mistake, and to foreclose the mortgage as amended, a judgment for defendant upon a finding that no mistake occurred, will not be disturbed on the ground that the evidence did not support the finding when the evidence on the material points of the ease is conflicting.
Per CURIAM. The contention of appellant in this ease is that the evidence is insufficient to justify the decision. We find, on an examination of the record, that the evidence is conflicting on the material points, and therefore the judgment and order must be affirmed. So ordered.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)