Boyle v. Solstien
California Supreme Court Mar 1, 1888 No. No. 11,665Published
Synopsis
Default—Judgment—Motion to Set Aside—Discretion.—To set aside a judgment by default on motion and affidavits showing that defendant’s attorney had suddenly died, and that defendant himself had no knowledge of the case, is not an abuse of the court’s discretion.
Per CURIAM. The court did not abuse its discretion in granting the motion to set aside the default and judgment. Order affirmed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)