Cahen v. Mahoney
Synopsis
Attachment — Dissolution — Affidavits — Counter-affidavits.— Where, upon a motion to dissolve an attachment, the counter-affidavits of the defendant are fully answered by the affidavits produced in behalf of plaintiffs, the court has no right to disregard or discredit the showing on behalf of plaintiffs, and, on appeal, the order dissolving the attachment will be reversed.
Attachment—Dissolution.—The Undertaking in This Case executed by the plaintiffs examined, and held to be sufficient.
By the COURT. The court erred in dissolving the attachment in this case. The affidavit of the defendant was fully answered by the affidavits produced on behalf of plaintiffs. The court had no right* to disregard or discredit the showing on behalf of plaintiffs. The undertaking was sufficient. Order reversed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)