State v. Folsom Water Co.
California Supreme Court Sep 15, 1886 No. No. 11,174Published
Synopsis
Deed — Construction — Condition—Canal — Water Company.—• Deed construed, and held not to impose on defendant water company the obligation to complete a certain canal named therein.
By the COURT We are of opinion that the deed from the Natoma Water & Mining Company to the state did not impose an obligation upon the company to proceed to the completion of the canal. Therefore the ruling of the court below on the demurrer was correct. Judgment affirmed.
More from California Supreme Court
- People v. Wende (1979)
- People v. Watson (1956)
- People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996)
- People v. Kelly (2006)
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior Court (1962)
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (2001)
- People v. Lewis (2021)
- In Re Estrada (1965)
- Denham v. Superior Court (1970)
- People v. Marsden (1970)