Hamill v. Littner (1885) · DecisionDepot

Hamill v. Littner

Name: California Superior Court Tentative Rulings
Creator: DecisionDepot
License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

California Supreme Court Aug 12, 1885 No. No. 9800Published

Before: Belcher

AI Brief

AI-generated · verify before citing

Holding. The court affirmed the judgment of the lower court based on the authority of the precedent established in Hay v. Hill.

Issues

Whether the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed based on the authority of Hay v. Hill.

Disposition. Affirmed

Quotations verified verbatim against the opinion

“The exact point involved in this case was decided in Hay v. Hill, 65 Cal. 383, 4 Pac. 378.”

“Upon the authority of that case, the judgment here should be affirmed.”

Synopsis

Findings—Submission on Agreed State of Facts.—Findings are not necessary in a case submitted on an agreed statement of facts.

BELCHER, C. C. This case was submitted to the court below upon an agreed statement of the facts, and findings were, therefore, not necessary. Besides, the court, in its decision of the case, recited the facts substantially as they were agreed to, and these facts, and the conclusions of law thereon, were separately stated. The exact point involved in this case was decided in Hay v. Hill, 65 Cal. 383, 4 Pac. 378. We are satisfied that that decision was right. Upon the authority of that case, the judgment here should be affirmed.

We concur: Searls, C.; Foote, C.

By the COURT.—For the reasons given in the foregoing opinion the judgment is affirmed.

Hamill v. Littner

AI Brief

Synopsis

More from California Supreme Court

Related research

AI Brief